Analytics page

The Analytics page provides an overview of the project progress.

By using the tabs on the left side of the screen, you can select whether you want to access:

• A general project overview
• Quality insights
• Project members' performance metrics

Permissions per user role in project Analytics page

📘

*Generally, all member roles can access the Analytics page. Reviewers and labelers can only access analytics data about their own work, though.

Overview

Overview contains a snapshot of the project. You can trace what's already been done and access a quick summary of open questions and skipped assets.

Use the visual progress bar to quickly check how many assets have been annotated, reviewed, or still left to do and then click on a specific category to immediately jump to the correctly filtered Explore view.

Additionally, you have access to an overall class balance, that is information on what percentage of the total number of annotations are labels given to a specific class. For extra granularity, you can select either the whole project or drill down to specific labeling jobs.

Quality

From the Quality tab, you have access to insights regarding consensus and honeypot metrics (if you set them up in your project). Information is presented per class (with an option to delve deeper, per job) and per labeler. You also have access to an overall total agreement score for consensus and honeypot. For information on how these are calculated, refer to Calculation rules for quality metrics.

When done, you can click directly on the graph to switch to the Explore view and start your review.

Use the graphs and scores to target the most relevant assets to focus your review on. For example, if you spot a class with the lowest consensus mark, you can then check on it by using the Explore view to properly research and address this issue.

Performance

From the Performance tab, you can check how many assets are being labeled and reviewed in a daily, weekly and monthly time frames. Note that we're taking into account actions, not just assets. So if two or more project members labeled (for example as part of consensus) or reviewed the same asset, the number will be higher.

From here, you can also access detailed labeling statistics that you can later export as a .csv file and process outside Kili.

Through performance metrics you can assess the velocity of your team after the project has been running for some time. How is it evolving per asset? Are some of the assets outliers? If so, why? Is the performance consistent with what you were expecting? How does it affect your project timeline? Once you have all this information, you can then deep dive and analyze available data per annotator to see if you can spot any discrepancies and items to focus on.